ASAWR.

It is not right to do a mischief in the land intentionally and then in the wake of serious protests the culprit asks for apology. Is the cartoonist not aware of the recent similar cartoons released in the internet by the enemies of Islam? What happened to the recent blaspheous act committed by a Danish Newspaper? Right from the beginning the authorities of Protham Alo and Daily Star have been publishing ficticious, defamatory and anti-Islamic news. Since I am a regular reader of Daily Star, I can say preciously that they get pleasure in publishing news against Islam and the Muslim Ummah. If a neutral reader collects 100 copies of Protham Alo and Daily Star from different dates, he will find many evidences that through their write ups and news items they jeopardise the interest of Islam, because they they are not good Muslim, I suppose. Even at times I have noted that they do more than what non-Muslims do against the interest of Islam. If one critically examines the personal life and character of the editors of these news papers, he will be convinced that once there is an opportunity they will try their best to harm Islam. It is obvious that they certainly serve the interests of a particular political party. And certainly they chose a right time when serious protests are banned to do this type of ugly act. If one critically examines the personal life of the cartoonist, he will find that he too is guilty of similar offences. Can one write whatever he likes in public or can one express his wish, whatever be it in public, in the name of the freedom of journalism? Can I express my personal desire that I wish to marry a particular lady head of state? Is it not maddness? I think all editors are clever people. If so, do they not know the news item(s) that are likely to cause havoc, unrest, fighting and chaoas in a land? Is there any pleasure to hurt the sentiments of the Muslims? So is it not justified that like in the American and European communities a Blasphamy Act be passed in the Bangladesh Parliament? Is it not the need of the hour? I am sure the ediotors of these dailies will start making hue and cry saying that it is against the fundamental human right? So how can an apology, which is not genuine and which is based on ill motives, and which is designed to just to avert a crisis, be accepted in the name of forgivness? I ask the reviewer of the request for apology to please note the punishment of those who intentionally create mischief in the land. Can one commit a murder and then ask for apology to forgive him? Where is then the law and order situation? It will be an act of greatness and courage if the authorities publish my comments. I did not hesitate to make my email address known.

Thaks a lot for the patience in reading my comments.